You are viewing the translated version of मुद्दाको सुनुवाई र बहस व्यवस्थापन.
Rule 21
Hearing and Argument Management
(1) In cases under the Jurisdiction of the Bench, the written answer shall be submitted to the Bench for hearing as soon as possible after submission of the written answer or after the expiry of the period thereof.
(2) In accordance with sub-rule (1), the information of the presentation of the case presented before the bench will be given to the legal professionals of the related parties as far as possible through information technology.
(3) After receiving the information as per sub-rule (2), the legal practitioner of the concerned party shall disclose the following matters and provide the written form of the argument to the court through information technology:-
(a) Constitutional, Legal and Factual Questions Involved in the Case,
(b) precedents established earlier in relation to questions under clause (a) and a copy of the same,
(c) Reference Materials and Copies thereof,
(d) Main points of debate,
(e) If there is more than one legal practitioner, which legal practitioner will debate which point.
(4) After receiving the form according to sub-rule (3), the concerned party shall not be allowed to appoint additional legal practitioners unless the bench gives permission.
(5) According to sub-rule (3), the registrar shall submit the draft of the debate before the bench, including the relevant missal.
(6) If deemed necessary by the trial court submitted in accordance with sub-rule (1), after determining the disputed question, it may order the lawyers of both parties and also the assistants of the court (amicus curiae) to submit written arguments limited to those questions.
(7) In case of an order according to sub-rule (6), at least two days before the final hearing, legal practitioners and court assistants (amicus curiae) of both sides must submit their arguments.
(8) Regardless of the number of petitioners or opponents in the case presented under sub-rule (1), half an hour will be allotted to each side's legal practitioner and half an hour to the court's amicus curiae in order to debate only the controversial questions determined by the bench. But the bench needs to look at the content of the dispute and the seriousness of the question to be resolvedAccording to the provision of more time, it will not be a hindrance to debate.
(9) The questions determined according to sub-rule (6) and within the time limit determined according to sub-rule (8) shall be debated by legal practitioners and court assistants (amicus curiae) of the respective parties.
(10) In the event that more than two legal practitioners are appointed by a party to argue according to sub-rule (8), the number of key legal practitioners and other practitioners who will argue from that side and the points to be debated must be determined by the legal practitioners of the respective parties themselves.
(11) In cases where the opinion of the amicus curiae has been ordered to be taken, the amicus curiae debate will be held after the arguments and counter-arguments of the lawyers of both sides are over.
(12) According to sub-rule (11), after the argument of the amicus curiae of the court, the legal practitioners of both parties are not allowed to argue again to refute or support.
(2) In accordance with sub-rule (1), the information of the presentation of the case presented before the bench will be given to the legal professionals of the related parties as far as possible through information technology.
(3) After receiving the information as per sub-rule (2), the legal practitioner of the concerned party shall disclose the following matters and provide the written form of the argument to the court through information technology:-
(a) Constitutional, Legal and Factual Questions Involved in the Case,
(b) precedents established earlier in relation to questions under clause (a) and a copy of the same,
(c) Reference Materials and Copies thereof,
(d) Main points of debate,
(e) If there is more than one legal practitioner, which legal practitioner will debate which point.
(4) After receiving the form according to sub-rule (3), the concerned party shall not be allowed to appoint additional legal practitioners unless the bench gives permission.
(5) According to sub-rule (3), the registrar shall submit the draft of the debate before the bench, including the relevant missal.
(6) If deemed necessary by the trial court submitted in accordance with sub-rule (1), after determining the disputed question, it may order the lawyers of both parties and also the assistants of the court (amicus curiae) to submit written arguments limited to those questions.
(7) In case of an order according to sub-rule (6), at least two days before the final hearing, legal practitioners and court assistants (amicus curiae) of both sides must submit their arguments.
(8) Regardless of the number of petitioners or opponents in the case presented under sub-rule (1), half an hour will be allotted to each side's legal practitioner and half an hour to the court's amicus curiae in order to debate only the controversial questions determined by the bench. But the bench needs to look at the content of the dispute and the seriousness of the question to be resolvedAccording to the provision of more time, it will not be a hindrance to debate.
(9) The questions determined according to sub-rule (6) and within the time limit determined according to sub-rule (8) shall be debated by legal practitioners and court assistants (amicus curiae) of the respective parties.
(10) In the event that more than two legal practitioners are appointed by a party to argue according to sub-rule (8), the number of key legal practitioners and other practitioners who will argue from that side and the points to be debated must be determined by the legal practitioners of the respective parties themselves.
(11) In cases where the opinion of the amicus curiae has been ordered to be taken, the amicus curiae debate will be held after the arguments and counter-arguments of the lawyers of both sides are over.
(12) According to sub-rule (11), after the argument of the amicus curiae of the court, the legal practitioners of both parties are not allowed to argue again to refute or support.